Artifact Evaluation for CGO'15 [ Back to CGO'15 conference website ]

---

Prizes for 2 highest ranked artifacts

1st place sponsored by	2nd place sponsored by
"Nvidia Quadro K6000" for "The SprayList: A scalable relaxed priority queue" Justin Kopinsky, Dan Alistarh, Jerry Li  and Nir Shavit	"Acer C720P" for "A graph-based higher-order intermediate representation" Roland Leißa, Marcel Köster and Sebastian Hack

---

Important dates CGO paper decision: 10 Nov 2014 Artifact submission: 18 Nov 2014 AoE Technical clarification: 10-12 Dec 2014 Decision announced: 16 Dec 2014 Public discussion: 9 Feb 2015 [ Slides ] Packaging guidelines We use the following guidelines for artifacts. Because we want to encourage as many of you as possible to submit, these are only guidelines, not hard rules. Of course, if the material you want us to evaluate is fairly standard, following these suggestions will greatly simplify our lives. After all, remember: You want us to be able to evaluate your artifact, don't you? How to submit Please read the guidelines on what to submit. Please upload your submission to EasyChair (common with PPoPP). Review process The review process is described in detail here.	Artifact Evaluation Committee (AEC) Chairs: Grigori Fursin, cTuning foundation, France Bruce R. Childers, University of Pittsburgh, USA Advisory board:  Shriram Krishnamurthi, Brown University, USA Committee members: David Boehme, LLNL, USA Santiago Bock, University of Pittsburgh, USA Lingda Li, Rutgers University, USA Lin Ma, Huawei America Research Lab, USA Yiannis Nikolakopulos, Chalmers University, Sweden Jeeva Paudel, University of Alberta, Canada Paul Thomson, Imperial College London, UK Peter Libic, Charles University in Prague, Czech Republic Dave Wilkinson, University of Pittsburgh, USA Weiwei Chen, Qualcomm, USA Riyadh Baghdadi, ENS and University Pierre et Marie Curie, Paris, France Na Meng, University of Texas Austin, USA Arun Raman, Qualcomm, USA Bapi Chatterjee, Chalmers University, Sweden Martin Maas, University of California Berkeley, USA Vojtech Horky, Charles University in Prague, Czech Republic Vasileios Trigonakis, EPFL, Switzerland Mahdi Eslamimehr, SAP Labs, USA Yuhao Zhu, University of Texas Austin, USA Melanie Kambadur, Columbia University, USA Michael Laurenzano, UMich, USA	Above threshold List of papers with artifacts above threshold: Locality-Centric Thread Scheduling for Bulk-synchronous Programming Models on CPU Architectures Hee-Seok Kim, Izzat El Hajj, John Stratton, Steven Lumetta and Wen-Mei Hwu MemorySanitizer: fast detector of uninitialized memory use in C++ Evgeniy Stepanov and Konstantin Serebryany A Parallel Abstract Interpreter for JavaScript Kyle Dewey, Vineeth Kashyap and Ben Hardekopf A Graph-Based Higher-Order Intermediate Representation Roland Leißa, Marcel Köster and Sebastian Hack Optimizing the flash-RAM energy trade-off in deeply embedded systems James Pallister, Kerstin Eder and Simon J. Hollis Scalable Conditional Induction Variable (CIV) Analysis Cosmin E. Oancea and Lawrence Rauchwerger Discussions We consider AE as a continuous learning curve. If you have questions or comments and suggestions on how to improve packaging and reviewing process, please get in touch or use our public Google or LinkedIn groups. We will hold a joint public CGO/PPoPP AE discussion session on February 9th, 2015.
Prior Artifact Evaluation Artifacts have been already evaluated at several conferences and workshops including recent PLDI 2014, OOPSLA 2014 and ADAPT 2014. Our eventual goal is to develop common evaluation methodology gradually and collaboratively. See artifact-eval.org, cknowledge.org/reproducibility and mailing list for more details.

---

Sponsors and supporters